Back to examples
Band 6.5CEFR B2Task 2387 words

Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?

The essay addresses all parts of the prompt with a clear position that advantages outweigh disadvantages. The organization is logical with distinct paragraphs, though some minor...

IELTS WritingCEFR B2Checked

Prompt

Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?

Essay review

Annotated essay

Interactive

Whether to take the entrance fee to visit the museum has been a subject of debate. While some museums provide free entry, other national or international museums ask for an entry fee. I strongly believe that there are multiple benefits of taking charges from tourists to visit museums. As most of the artefacts are precious and old; they need to be preserved with care, even the administration needs funds to secure these treasures. Although there are some drawbacks to priced tickets, the advantages are more positive than the disadvantages.

One of the major advantages of charging admission to museums is to get financial resources to conserve historical documents, artistic achievements, world-famous paintings, and many other ancient evidence. They require specialised conservation and a high level of security. Maintenance, highly trained caretakers, and cleaning equipment are really expensive. To protect and to preserve these old and rare things, authorities need funds. Entrance fees helps museum to cover these expenses and ensure that these priceless collections will be preserved for future generations. For example, visitors to the Louvre Museum pay an entrance fee, which helps fund the preservation of priceless artworks, including Leonardo Da Vinci's Mona Lisa.

Another benefit of taking entry charges is that, it enables improving visitor facilities , such as providing audio books to the international tourists, arranging art exhibitions for art lovers, create digital documentaries to make the museum experience more engaging. In addition, provide clean restrooms, cafes, and provide guided tours to visitors to enhance their overall experience of visiting the museums. As a result, museums become a must-visit place for students, historians, archaeoligists and tourists.

Admittedly, charging an entrance fee can discourage some people, particularly low-income families and students. This could limit their opportunities to learn about history and culture. However, this drawback can be solved by providing discounts on special days or by giving concessions for students, kids, and senior citizens. These measures can also help the administration and people who can spend little on museums.

In conclusion, although admission fees can restrict the visit of some people, the benefits are more valuable. Charging nominal fees can make everyone visit the museums, so that they can get familiar with the nation's history, cultural heritage, and provide a richer experience of the visit. Hence, the advantages of this policy clearly outweigh its disadvantages.

Improvement plan

Close to Band 7.0

Current Band 6.5

Target Band 7.0

  • Consistent error-free complex structures with precise subject-verb agreement.
  • A wider, more flexible range of sophisticated vocabulary and academic collocations used without repetition.
  • Flawless punctuation control without comma splices or misplaced commas.

Strengths

Task Response

Clear, direct thesis statement establishing the writer's position from the outset.

Coherence

Effective topic sentence establishing the theme of the first body paragraph.

Grammar

Well-integrated relative clause providing a specific and accurate illustrative example.

Weaknesses

Subject-Verb Agreement Lapses

Medium

The essay contains agreement errors where plural subjects are paired with singular verbs or vice versa.

Lexical Repetition

Medium

The writer frequently repeats phrases such as 'entrance fee' and 'taking charges' rather than varying vocabulary.

Parallelism and Punctuation Slips

Low

Coordination in lists (e.g., in infinitive and gerund phrases) is occasionally unbalanced, and minor punctuation errors occur.

Priority improvements

  1. 1Eliminate Subject-Verb Agreement ErrorsEnsure plural subjects take plural verbs consistently across all sentences to improve grammatical accuracy and score higher in Grammatical Range and Accuracy.Impact: Medium
  2. 2Expand and Vary Lexical RangeAvoid repeating phrases like 'taking charges' and 'entrance fee' by incorporating a wider variety of synonyms and precise academic collocations.Impact: Medium
  3. 3Refine Punctuation and ParallelismCheck for unnecessary commas, ensure proper semicolon use, and maintain parallel structure in lists of gerunds or infinitives.Impact: Low

Error patterns

Band & CEFR

Band 6.5

B2

Confidence: High

Assessment summary

The essay addresses all parts of the prompt with a clear position that advantages outweigh disadvantages. The organization is logical with distinct paragraphs, though some minor mechanical cohesion issues and repetitive vocabulary ('take charges', 'fees helps') occur. Grammatical control is generally sound with a mix of complex structures, but occasional agreement, punctuation, and word form errors prevent a higher band.

Scoring criteria

Strengths

  • Uses several appropriate topic-specific terms such as 'artefacts', 'preservation', 'conservation', and 'heritage'.
  • Attempts some less common vocabulary items like 'specialised conservation' and 'concessions'.

Weaknesses

  • Relies on repetitive phrasing such as 'taking charges' and 'entry charges'.
  • Contains a spelling error ('archaeoligists') and minor collocation infelicities.

Justification

A sufficient range of vocabulary is displayed to allow flexibility and precision, but recurrent slight infelicities and repetitions keep the score at 6.0.

Writing stats

Words
387
Paragraphs
5
Estimated time
3 min read
Grammar issues
5
Lexical suggestions
5
Major issues
3
Minor issues
4
Top error pattern
Minor Punctuation and Formatting Lapses
Confidence
High