Back to examples
Band 4.5CEFR B1Task 2215 words

Consumers are faced with increasing number pf advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them?

The response addresses both parts of the prompt with a visible stance, but it suffers from severe grammatical errors, run-on sentences, punctuation issues, and informal or awkwa...

IELTS WritingCEFR B1Checked

Prompt

Consumers are faced with increasing number pf advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them?

Essay review

Annotated essay

Interactive

Purchasers are continually swamped with an accelerating amount of advertisements from competing corporations. the question is how much do the buyers get impacted by these commercials? and is their anything that can be done for their safeguarding from predatory ads?

The way massive quantities of commercials function, is that by swamping the feeds and surrounding of people subconsciously will be convinced to switch companies for the services and or products they consume, this technique relies majority on the hidden factors of peoples mind which can be viewed as a "dirty" method of earning more revenue.

As a general understanding in any free market promotion is one of the greatest ways of getting new consumers of any products and or services, this being said competition in between companies is a real tactic to gain new buyers and consumers for their services as a whole, this being said you can say that most time these paths to getting new consmers from other rivals can be a bit predatory, and it falls on the governments of each country to establish failsafes to safeguard consumers from those methods. so by implementing laws over companies to stop them from monopolising competitions and stopping predatory tactics you can control and stop a massive amount of that for the whole consumer pool.

Improvement plan

Close to Band 5.5

Current Band 4.5

Target Band 5.5

  • Control over sentence boundaries to eliminate run-on sentences and comma splices.
  • Consistent correct spelling and avoidance of informal conversational fillers.
  • Clear paragraph organization with topic sentences and fully extended supporting arguments.

Strengths

Task Response

The writer clearly identifies a protective measure involving government regulation, addressing the second part of the prompt.

Weaknesses

Severe Sentence Boundary and Punctuation Errors

High

The essay contains multiple run-on sentences, fused clauses, missing capital letters at sentence starts, and sentence fragments, making it difficult to parse.

Lack of Detailed Elaboration and Examples

High

Claims are made without concrete empirical examples, leading to assertion-only paragraphs that do not fully extend the argument.

Register Inconsistencies and Spelling Errors

Medium

Informal expressions mix with academic concepts, and recurring spelling mistakes reduce lexical precision.

Priority improvements

  1. 1Eliminate Run-on Sentences and Punctuation LapsesThe essay frequently links independent clauses with commas or no punctuation at all, making it difficult for the reader to follow the argument. Breaking sentences down into clear, punctuated units will drastically improve Coherence and Grammar scores.Impact: High
  2. 2Enhance Academic Register and Vocabulary PrecisionReplacing conversational phrasing ('a bit predatory', 'dirty method', 'you can say') and correcting recurring spelling errors ('pf', 'consmers') will raise Lexical Resource.Impact: Medium

Error patterns

Band & CEFR

Band 4.5

B1

Confidence: High

Assessment summary

The response addresses both parts of the prompt with a visible stance, but it suffers from severe grammatical errors, run-on sentences, punctuation issues, and informal or awkward vocabulary. The structure lacks clear paragraphs with controlled topic development, and the mechanical flow is frequently disrupted by fused sentences and capitalization mistakes.

Scoring criteria

Strengths

  • Attempts complex structures such as subordinate and relative clauses.

Weaknesses

  • Pervasive punctuation and sentence boundary errors, including sentence fragments, fused sentences, and missing capital letters.
  • Repeated grammatical errors such as subject-verb disagreement ('is their anything') and incorrect pronoun usage.

Justification

Grammatical control is weak throughout, with numerous run-on sentences, capitalization failures, and basic errors occurring across simple and complex clauses, fitting Band 4.0.

Writing stats

Words
215
Paragraphs
3
Estimated time
2 min read
Grammar issues
6
Lexical suggestions
5
Major issues
10
Minor issues
2
Top error pattern
Sentence Boundary and Capitalization Lapses
Confidence
High