Back to examples
Band 6.5CEFR B2Task 2383 words

Some people think that government funding for schools should be spent on science subjects rather than on other subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The essay presents a clear and well-developed opinion with relevant arguments throughout, though some supporting examples remain somewhat general. Cohesion is managed effectivel...

IELTS WritingCEFR B2Checked

Prompt

Some people think that government funding for schools should be spent on science subjects rather than on other subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay review

Annotated essay

Interactive

Certain people are under the impression that scientific subjects ought to get a majority of the budget allotted to schools by the government. I strongly disagree, as I feel that all paths students wish to pursue need to be equally promoted. This can only be accomplished by applying comparable spending to all facets of learning involved in school education.

Firstly, if the sciences receive more funding, it will create unequal opportunities for those who would not wish to not pursue careers in their related fields. Many students do not need to take sciences in order to continue their preferred career path, but would still be impacted by this choice. For example, if a student is keen on the arts, but takes no scientific subjects, they will get worse supplies to pursue their passion. Thus, this produces an unequal environment, placing students pursuing science at an advantage compared to their peers. Moreover, this inequality may discourage students from pursuing what they truly desire. In order to receive the benefits of the larger budgets these subjects use, students may not take disciplines they are more interested in. For instance, if a student is interested in becoming an athlete, but their institution neglects sport, they might choose to take the overfunded chemistry course, despite not having any affinity towards chemistry. This is unfair for students who do not desire to follow such paths, or who may be incorrectly encouraged to take them.

The sciences are more demanding than other courses in terms of expenditure. Chemistry, biology and physics all require costly lab equipment to be purchased and used. Without this equipment, these disciplines would not be taught effectively. A common occurrence of this is seen in the subject of chemistry, where students need to use titration equipment in order to make calculations and solve chemical equations. At the same time, I think that this fact should not be used to underfund other programmes, as they too have important expenditures.

In conclusion, the expensive equipment used in science makes it seem like spending should be focused on these areas of schooling. However, I believe that, despite this fact, we must make conscious efforts to attain high quality in all areas of schooling, in order to not discourage pupils from pursuing the careers they are most passionate about.

Improvement plan

Close to Band 7.0

Current Band 6.5

Target Band 7.0

  • More consistent use of precise academic vocabulary without informal word choices.
  • Completely error-free complex sentences and flawless control of infinitives.

Strengths

Task Response

Establishes a clear, direct stance in the introduction that guides the entire essay.

Coherence

Provides a clear topic sentence that introduces the main argument of the paragraph.

Grammar

Successfully integrates a conditional subordinate structure to explain consequences.

Weaknesses

Minor Grammatical Inaccuracies

Low

Occasional awkward phrasing and minor double negatives reduce overall grammatical precision.

Lexical Precision Lapses

Low

Certain word choices like 'worse supplies' lack ideal academic register.

Priority improvements

  1. 1Refine Lexical PrecisionReplace basic or slightly informal phrasing with more sophisticated academic collocations to elevate the vocabulary score.Impact: Medium
  2. 2Enhance Example SpecificityEnsure supporting examples in body paragraphs incorporate more specific contextual details rather than broad generalities.Impact: Low

Error patterns

Band & CEFR

Band 6.5

B2

Confidence: High

Assessment summary

The essay presents a clear and well-developed opinion with relevant arguments throughout, though some supporting examples remain somewhat general. Cohesion is managed effectively, and vocabulary is generally appropriate with some good academic phrasing, despite occasional repetitive vocabulary items. Grammatical control is fairly solid with a good mix of complex sentences, though some minor errors and clumsy phrasing appear.

Scoring criteria

Strengths

  • Incorporates appropriate academic vocabulary and topic-specific terms like 'expenditure', 'inequality', and 'titration equipment'.
  • Uses precise verbs and nouns to convey stance effectively.

Weaknesses

  • Some minor word choice infelicities occur, such as 'worse supplies' instead of 'inferior resources' or 'less adequate equipment'.

Justification

Vocabulary is sufficient to allow flexible discussion with some precise terms, but occasional less natural collocations prevent a higher band.

Writing stats

Words
383
Paragraphs
4
Estimated time
3 min read
Grammar issues
1
Lexical suggestions
4
Major issues
0
Minor issues
1
Top error pattern
Awkward Modifier and Subordination Construction
Confidence
High